It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
There is wind where the rose was,
Cold rain where sweet grass was,
And clouds like sheep
Stream o'er the steep
Grey skies where the lark was.
Nought warm where your hand was,
Nought gold where your hair was,
But phantom, forlorn,
Beneath the thorn,
Your ghost where your face was.
Cold wind where your voice was,
Tears, tears where my heart was,
And ever with me,
Child, ever with me,
Silence where hope was.
November by Walter de la Mare
Should governments spend money on space research?
There have always been considerable discussions about governments should spend public tax payers' money on space research. In my opinion it is impossible to justify the amount of money spent on such projects. Generally speaking, the main reason for this position is that there are several areas in which money would be invested better.
The first point to make is that politicians have a responsibility to spend pulic money on projects that bring a benefit to the general public.This has not been the case with space research as most developments have been limited to helping the astronuts in space or have been very specialised.For example, it is not of great value to the general pubulic that we now have pens and biros that can write upside down. This does not merit the huge amount of money spent.
The second point to make is that there are many much more urgent projects that require investment. If governments spent less money on space research, they could be able to help solve some of those problems such as popullation control, elimination of diseases like colera, global warming and food shortage. It seems to me that all of these issues are more important because they affect the lives of millions of ordinary people. An illustration of this is that the US government could provide food for all starving people in the world if they did not spend so much on NASA.
My conclusion is the politicians should not fund the space research. The grounds of saying this are that it is very costly and provides few real benefits. Furthermore, there are several more urgent issues that need to be funded.