It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

There is wind where the rose was,
Cold rain where sweet grass was,
And clouds like sheep
Stream o'er the steep
Grey skies where the lark was.

Nought warm where your hand was,
Nought gold where your hair was,
But phantom, forlorn,
Beneath the thorn,
Your ghost where your face was.

Cold wind where your voice was,
Tears, tears where my heart was,
And ever with me,
Child, ever with me,
Silence where hope was.

November by Walter de la Mare
Don't forget to check the calendar(s) for session times. Sessions are held on different platforms, so be sure to find out where the session will take place:-

Speaking Practice

LEN English sessions:-

Listening Practice 24/7

English radio playlists:-


XanthippeXanthippe Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭✭✭
@Lynne, can I leave it like this:

On the other, it illustrates what a minefield to navigate the dialectical facet of probability is for historians of science.


  • LynneLynne Your Teacher HomePosts: 9,581 mod
    edited August 8
    On the other what?

    We normally say, "On the other hand,..."

    I would write, "On the other hand, it illustrates what a minefield it can be, for historians of science, to navigate the dialectical facet of probability."

    I would say, "can be" or "may be" because some historians of science may not find it problematic.
  • XanthippeXanthippe Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Of course, on the other hand.

    Yes, it may be unproblematic. :) Thank you very much. :)
  • XanthippeXanthippe Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Or perhaps it would be simpler:

    "On the other hand, it illustrates what a minefield the dialectical facet of probability can be for historians of science."
Sign In or Register to comment.